America's Welfare Programs Should Be Abolished: Views shared between Egoists, Utilitarians and supporters of the Divine Command Theory

Welf atomic number 18 is a government course of study that provides money, medical care, food, housing, and other(a) things that wad need in dictate to survive. populate who can cope with help from these public assistance designs are children, elders, the disabled, and others who can non support their families on their flowing income. The well-being program has gone from a well-meaning program designed to fend for people who are unable to scat and provide for their children, to a program that has become counterproductive to eliminating the aeonian dependence of the recipients. It moldiness be understood that the offbeat system, as we know it, must be organizeed over a long period of condemnation; but unfortunately in that respect are no quick fixes. There are several movements wherefore the eudaimonia system must be eliminated. A utilitarianist, or someone who believes in doing what will maximize social utility, care derriere Stuart Mills, would say that the money used to fund eudaemonia could be used in bettering the education system. In doing this, it would fix the enigma at the root of it all, and educate people, instead of eating their topical state. This would be best for society as a whole. other way to describe utilitarianism is to say that they believe that the decisions we admit should forever and a day avail the most people as ofttimes as possible, regardless of the consequences to the minority or even yourself. other reason under that theory would be to say that by eliminating welfare, from each one person would have to pay less income taxes with obligatory payments. This would benefit society as a whole, since the emergence of Americans not on welfare outnumber the amount that are. Another reason a utilitarian would be opposed to welfare is because it allows people to be more complacent and lax just about sustenance themselves. By allowing people to not be... Welfar! e should be reformed, and not abolished, if we care to remain a compassionate society. The primary recipients of welfare are children. Children dont get to choose their parents and should not be unduly punished because of something thats not their fault. I do not privation to see children go hungry or be without shelter. receipts given by the government to the needy is mandated by charity, which admittedly defies rhetorical elegance. If you want to get a full essay, distinguish it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay